Hong Kong vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita

Hong Kong
4.6
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
4.92
in 2024
Hong Kong rank
58th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
55th

Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
02468197019972024

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 4.92 against 4.6 in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.32.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 58th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 55th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 5 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 2.74 0.6136 2.12 Hong Kong
1980s 4.62 0.473 4.15 Hong Kong
1990s 6.48 0.3579 6.12 Hong Kong
2000s 6.28 1.52 4.76 Hong Kong
2010s 6.15 2.66 3.49 Hong Kong
2020s 4.54 4.82 0.28 Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy use per capita vs. co₂ emissions per capita, Hong Kong or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 4.92 against 4.6 in Hong Kong as of 2024.
What is the difference in energy use per capita vs. co₂ emissions per capita between Hong Kong and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.32, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Turks and Caicos Islands?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for energy use per capita vs. co₂ emissions per capita?
Hong Kong ranks 58th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 55th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Joint Research Centre (European Commission) and International Energy Agency (IEA), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Joint Research Centre (European Commission) and International Energy Agency (IEA), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-use-per-capita-vs-co2-emissions-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-use-per-capita-vs-co2-emissions-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Hong Kong vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita
Source
Joint Research Centre (European Commission) and International Energy Agency (IEA), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
203 places, 11,165 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Average energy consumption per capita is measured in kilowatt-hours per person. Average carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions per capita are measured in tonnes per person.