New Caledonia vs Saudi Arabia: Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita

New Caledonia
17.08
in 2024
Saudi Arabia
18.48
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
10th
Saudi Arabia rank
8th

Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Saudi Arabia
102030197019972024

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 18.48 against 17.08 in New Caledonia, a difference of 1.4.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 10th and Saudi Arabia ranks 8th of 203 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1970s 10.12 22.63 12.51 Saudi Arabia
1980s 8.66 21.04 12.37 Saudi Arabia
1990s 8.86 16.46 7.61 Saudi Arabia
2000s 10.59 16.97 6.38 Saudi Arabia
2010s 16.15 19.99 3.83 Saudi Arabia
2020s 17.23 18.82 1.59 Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy use per capita vs. co₂ emissions per capita, New Caledonia or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 18.48 against 17.08 in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in energy use per capita vs. co₂ emissions per capita between New Caledonia and Saudi Arabia?
1.4, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Saudi Arabia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for energy use per capita vs. co₂ emissions per capita?
New Caledonia ranks 10th and Saudi Arabia ranks 8th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Joint Research Centre (European Commission) and International Energy Agency (IEA), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Saudi Arabia: Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Joint Research Centre (European Commission) and International Energy Agency (IEA), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-use-per-capita-vs-co2-emissions-per-capita/new-caledonia/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-use-per-capita-vs-co2-emissions-per-capita/new-caledonia/saudi-arabia/">New Caledonia vs Saudi Arabia: Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita
Source
Joint Research Centre (European Commission) and International Energy Agency (IEA), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
203 places, 11,165 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Average energy consumption per capita is measured in kilowatt-hours per person. Average carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions per capita are measured in tonnes per person.