New Caledonia vs United Arab Emirates: Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita

New Caledonia
17.08
in 2024
United Arab Emirates
18.26
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
10th
United Arab Emirates rank
9th

Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita over time

  • New Caledonia
  • United Arab Emirates
020406080197019972024

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 18.26 against 17.08 in New Caledonia, a difference of 1.18.

That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 10th and United Arab Emirates ranks 9th of 203 countries.

United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1970s 10.12 68.44 58.32 United Arab Emirates
1980s 8.66 34.28 25.62 United Arab Emirates
1990s 8.86 30.12 21.27 United Arab Emirates
2000s 10.59 25.73 15.15 United Arab Emirates
2010s 16.15 23.62 7.46 United Arab Emirates
2020s 17.23 19.53 2.3 United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy use per capita vs. co₂ emissions per capita, New Caledonia or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 18.26 against 17.08 in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in energy use per capita vs. co₂ emissions per capita between New Caledonia and United Arab Emirates?
1.18, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and United Arab Emirates?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for energy use per capita vs. co₂ emissions per capita?
New Caledonia ranks 10th and United Arab Emirates ranks 9th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Joint Research Centre (European Commission) and International Energy Agency (IEA), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs United Arab Emirates: Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Joint Research Centre (European Commission) and International Energy Agency (IEA), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-use-per-capita-vs-co2-emissions-per-capita/new-caledonia/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-use-per-capita-vs-co2-emissions-per-capita/new-caledonia/united-arab-emirates/">New Caledonia vs United Arab Emirates: Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita
Source
Joint Research Centre (European Commission) and International Energy Agency (IEA), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
203 places, 11,165 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Average energy consumption per capita is measured in kilowatt-hours per person. Average carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions per capita are measured in tonnes per person.