Panama vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita

Panama
2.74
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
2.88
in 2024
Panama rank
97th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
94th

Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita over time

  • Panama
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0123197019972024

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 2.88 against 2.74 in Panama, a difference of 0.14.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 97th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 94th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 5 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1970s 1.78 0.4069 1.37 Panama
1980s 1.37 0.4498 0.9251 Panama
1990s 1.53 0.8152 0.7165 Panama
2000s 1.99 1.43 0.5666 Panama
2010s 2.68 2.13 0.5422 Panama
2020s 2.59 2.7 0.1121 Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy use per capita vs. co₂ emissions per capita, Panama or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 2.88 against 2.74 in Panama as of 2024.
What is the difference in energy use per capita vs. co₂ emissions per capita between Panama and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.14, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Panama and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for energy use per capita vs. co₂ emissions per capita?
Panama ranks 97th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 94th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Joint Research Centre (European Commission) and International Energy Agency (IEA), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Joint Research Centre (European Commission) and International Energy Agency (IEA), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-use-per-capita-vs-co2-emissions-per-capita/panama/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-use-per-capita-vs-co2-emissions-per-capita/panama/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Panama vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita
Source
Joint Research Centre (European Commission) and International Energy Agency (IEA), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
203 places, 11,165 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Average energy consumption per capita is measured in kilowatt-hours per person. Average carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions per capita are measured in tonnes per person.