Puerto Rico vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita

Puerto Rico
4.82
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
4.92
in 2024
Puerto Rico rank
57th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
55th

Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
051015197019972024

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 4.92 against 4.82 in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.1.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 57th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 55th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 5 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 13.45 0.6136 12.84 Puerto Rico
1980s 6.83 0.473 6.36 Puerto Rico
1990s 5.88 0.3579 5.52 Puerto Rico
2000s 5.6 1.52 4.08 Puerto Rico
2010s 3.42 2.66 0.7541 Puerto Rico
2020s 4.28 4.82 0.5454 Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy use per capita vs. co₂ emissions per capita, Puerto Rico or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 4.92 against 4.82 in Puerto Rico as of 2024.
What is the difference in energy use per capita vs. co₂ emissions per capita between Puerto Rico and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.1, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Turks and Caicos Islands?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Puerto Rico and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for energy use per capita vs. co₂ emissions per capita?
Puerto Rico ranks 57th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 55th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Joint Research Centre (European Commission) and International Energy Agency (IEA), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Joint Research Centre (European Commission) and International Energy Agency (IEA), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-use-per-capita-vs-co2-emissions-per-capita/puerto-rico-us/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-use-per-capita-vs-co2-emissions-per-capita/puerto-rico-us/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Puerto Rico vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy use per capita vs. CO₂ emissions per capita
Source
Joint Research Centre (European Commission) and International Energy Agency (IEA), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
203 places, 11,165 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Average energy consumption per capita is measured in kilowatt-hours per person. Average carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions per capita are measured in tonnes per person.