Ecuador vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre

Ecuador
0.0009 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0009 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
82nd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
85th

Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0010.0010.0020.002196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.0009 kt per square kilometre against 0.0009 kt per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Ecuador ranks 82nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 85th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.001 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enteric fermentation — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Ecuador, at 0.0009 kt per square kilometre against 0.0009 kt per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in enteric fermentation — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for enteric fermentation — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 82nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 85th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-ch4-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-ch4-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Ecuador vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CH4) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.