Pakistan vs South-Eastern Asia: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate

Pakistan
3.17 % change on previous year
in 2023
South-Eastern Asia
-0.1471 % change on previous year
in 2023
Pakistan rank
22nd
South-Eastern Asia rank
25th

Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate over time

  • Pakistan
  • South-Eastern Asia
-20-10010196219922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 3.17 % change on previous year against -0.1471 % change on previous year in South-Eastern Asia, a difference of 3.32 % change on previous year.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 21.5 times South-Eastern Asia's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 22nd and South-Eastern Asia ranks 25th of 199 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan South-Eastern Asia Difference Ahead
1960s 2.42 % change on previous year 2.11 % change on previous year 0.309 % change on previous year Pakistan
1970s 2.25 % change on previous year -0.3957 % change on previous year 2.65 % change on previous year Pakistan
1980s 3.01 % change on previous year 2.36 % change on previous year 0.6504 % change on previous year Pakistan
1990s 2.42 % change on previous year 0.2347 % change on previous year 2.19 % change on previous year Pakistan
2000s 3.28 % change on previous year 1.76 % change on previous year 1.53 % change on previous year Pakistan
2010s 3.13 % change on previous year -0.4704 % change on previous year 3.6 % change on previous year Pakistan
2020s 3.16 % change on previous year 0.9159 % change on previous year 2.25 % change on previous year Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate, Pakistan or South-Eastern Asia?
Pakistan, at 3.17 % change on previous year against -0.1471 % change on previous year in South-Eastern Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate between Pakistan and South-Eastern Asia?
3.32 % change on previous year, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and South-Eastern Asia?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and South-Eastern Asia rank globally for enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate?
Pakistan ranks 22nd and South-Eastern Asia ranks 25th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs South-Eastern Asia: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/pakistan/south-eastern-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/pakistan/south-eastern-asia/">Pakistan vs South-Eastern Asia: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
246 places, 13,891 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.