Australia vs New Caledonia: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Australia
0.0089 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.0077 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
130th
New Caledonia rank
133rd

Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • New Caledonia
00.0050.010.015196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0089 kt per square kilometre against 0.0077 kt per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0012 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Australia ranks 130th and New Caledonia ranks 133rd of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0092 kt per square kilometre 0.0103 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 0.011 kt per square kilometre 0.0113 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 0.0095 kt per square kilometre 0.0115 kt per square kilometre 0.002 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 0.0097 kt per square kilometre 0.0109 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 0.0092 kt per square kilometre 0.0097 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0.0083 kt per square kilometre 0.0084 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.0078 kt per square kilometre 0.0078 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Australia or New Caledonia?
Australia, at 0.0089 kt per square kilometre against 0.0077 kt per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Australia and New Caledonia?
0.0012 kt per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Caledonia rank globally for enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 130th and New Caledonia ranks 133rd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs New Caledonia: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/australia/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/australia/new-caledonia/">Australia vs New Caledonia: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.