Belarus vs Tonga: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Belarus
0.0424 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Tonga
0.0431 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
46th
Tonga rank
44th

Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Tonga
0.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 0.0431 kt per square kilometre against 0.0424 kt per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0007 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 46th and Tonga ranks 44th of 170 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Tonga in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Tonga Difference Ahead
1990s 0.057 kt per square kilometre 0.0365 kt per square kilometre 0.0204 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.0431 kt per square kilometre 0.0401 kt per square kilometre 0.003 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0.0438 kt per square kilometre 0.0416 kt per square kilometre 0.0023 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.0428 kt per square kilometre 0.043 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Belarus or Tonga?
Tonga, at 0.0431 kt per square kilometre against 0.0424 kt per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Belarus and Tonga?
0.0007 kt per square kilometre, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Tonga?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Tonga rank globally for enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 46th and Tonga ranks 44th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Tonga: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/tonga/">Belarus vs Tonga: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.