Cuba vs El Salvador: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Cuba
0.0603 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
0.0674 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
25th
El Salvador rank
22nd

Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • El Salvador
00.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.0674 kt per square kilometre against 0.0603 kt per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.0071 kt per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

Cuba ranks 25th and El Salvador ranks 22nd of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0979 kt per square kilometre 0.0961 kt per square kilometre 0.0018 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.0881 kt per square kilometre 0.0966 kt per square kilometre 0.0085 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 0.0815 kt per square kilometre 0.0884 kt per square kilometre 0.0069 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0.0764 kt per square kilometre 0.0997 kt per square kilometre 0.0232 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.0667 kt per square kilometre 0.1063 kt per square kilometre 0.0396 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.0694 kt per square kilometre 0.0815 kt per square kilometre 0.0121 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.0631 kt per square kilometre 0.0686 kt per square kilometre 0.0055 kt per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Cuba or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 0.0674 kt per square kilometre against 0.0603 kt per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Cuba and El Salvador?
0.0071 kt per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and El Salvador rank globally for enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 25th and El Salvador ranks 22nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs El Salvador: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/cuba/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/cuba/el-salvador/">Cuba vs El Salvador: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.