Australia and New Zealand vs Viet Nam: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4

Australia and New Zealand
109,556 kt
in 2050
Viet Nam
31,789 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
9th
Viet Nam rank
7th

Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Viet Nam
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196120052050

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 109,556 kt against 31,789 kt in Viet Nam, a difference of 77,767 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 3.4 times Viet Nam's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Viet Nam ranks 7th of 194 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Viet Nam Difference Ahead
1960s 96,892 kt 6,311 kt 90,581 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 114,143 kt 5,950 kt 108,193 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 103,944 kt 7,681 kt 96,263 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 103,090 kt 9,799 kt 93,291 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 98,483 kt 12,336 kt 86,147 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 91,462 kt 12,391 kt 79,071 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 86,508 kt 13,044 kt 73,464 kt Australia and New Zealand
2030s 108,019 kt 21,862 kt 86,157 kt Australia and New Zealand
2050s 109,556 kt 31,789 kt 77,767 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Australia and New Zealand or Viet Nam?
Australia and New Zealand, at 109,556 kt against 31,789 kt in Viet Nam as of 2050.
What is the difference in enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Australia and New Zealand and Viet Nam?
77,767 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Viet Nam?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Viet Nam rank globally for enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Viet Nam ranks 7th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Viet Nam: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/viet-nam-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/viet-nam-2/">Australia and New Zealand vs Viet Nam: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,610 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf