China, Hong Kong SAR vs Equatorial Guinea: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4

China, Hong Kong SAR
6.8 kt
in 2050
Equatorial Guinea
13.68 kt
in 2050
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
184th
Equatorial Guinea rank
181st

Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Equatorial Guinea
10203040196120052050

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 13.68 kt against 6.8 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 6.88 kt.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 2.0 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 184th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 181st of 194 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 3 and Equatorial Guinea in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 30.71 kt 7.19 kt 23.52 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 29.87 kt 8.84 kt 21.03 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 17.84 kt 9.94 kt 7.89 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 8.06 kt 10.74 kt 2.69 kt Equatorial Guinea
2000s 8.55 kt 11.31 kt 2.76 kt Equatorial Guinea
2010s 7.3 kt 11.96 kt 4.66 kt Equatorial Guinea
2020s 6.73 kt 12.36 kt 5.63 kt Equatorial Guinea
2030s 5.7 kt 12.24 kt 6.54 kt Equatorial Guinea
2050s 6.8 kt 13.68 kt 6.87 kt Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, China, Hong Kong SAR or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 13.68 kt against 6.8 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2050.
What is the difference in enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between China, Hong Kong SAR and Equatorial Guinea?
6.88 kt, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Equatorial Guinea?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 184th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 181st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Equatorial Guinea: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/equatorial-guinea/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Equatorial Guinea: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,610 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf