Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Norway: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) (CO2eq CH4)

Democratic Republic of the Congo
3,057 kt
in 2050
Norway
2,656 kt
in 2050
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
119th
Norway rank
122nd

Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) (CO2eq CH4) over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Norway
1.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k3.0k3.5k196120052050

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 3,057 kt against 2,656 kt in Norway, a difference of 401 kt.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 1.2 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 119th and Norway ranks 122nd of 227 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 1,103 kt 3,102 kt 1,999 kt Norway
1970s 1,429 kt 2,612 kt 1,183 kt Norway
1980s 1,670 kt 2,723 kt 1,053 kt Norway
1990s 1,775 kt 2,715 kt 939.25 kt Norway
2000s 1,388 kt 2,537 kt 1,149 kt Norway
2010s 1,579 kt 2,347 kt 768.57 kt Norway
2020s 2,110 kt 2,337 kt 227.21 kt Norway
2030s 2,042 kt 2,602 kt 559.73 kt Norway
2050s 3,057 kt 2,656 kt 400.9 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Norway?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 3,057 kt against 2,656 kt in Norway as of 2050.
What is the difference in enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Norway?
401 kt, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Norway?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Norway rank globally for enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 119th and Norway ranks 122nd of 227 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Norway: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/norway/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Norway: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
260 places, 15,408 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf