Congo vs Germany: Farm gate — Emissions (CO2), per capita
Congo
0.0005 kt per person
in 2023
Germany
0.0005 kt per person
in 2023
Congo rank
30th
Germany rank
31st
Farm gate — Emissions (CO2), per capita over time
- Congo
- Germany
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.0005 kt per person against 0.0005 kt per person in Germany, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Germany's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 30th and Germany ranks 31st of 201 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.001 kt per person | 0.0004 kt per person | 0.0005 kt per person | Congo |
| 2000s | 0.0007 kt per person | 0.0004 kt per person | 0.0002 kt per person | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.0006 kt per person | 0.0005 kt per person | 0.0001 kt per person | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.0005 kt per person | 0.0005 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher farm gate — emissions (co2), per capita, Congo or Germany?
- Congo, at 0.0005 kt per person against 0.0005 kt per person in Germany as of 2023.
- What is the difference in farm gate — emissions (co2), per capita between Congo and Germany?
- 0 kt per person, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Germany?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Germany rank globally for farm gate — emissions (co2), per capita?
- Congo ranks 30th and Germany ranks 31st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Farm gate — Emissions (CO2), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Farm gate — Emissions (CO2) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.