Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Sudan (former): Farm gate — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
659,410 kt
in 2023
Sudan (former)
74,891 kt
in 2011
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
10th
Sudan (former) rank
12th

Farm gate — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Sudan (former)
0200.0k400.0k600.0k199020062023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 659,410 kt against 74,891 kt in Sudan (former), a difference of 584,519 kt.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 8.8 times Sudan (former)'s.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th and Sudan (former) ranks 12th of 32 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Sudan (former) Difference Ahead
1990s 349,336 kt 55,796 kt 293,540 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 440,603 kt 73,792 kt 366,810 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 516,602 kt 75,110 kt 441,492 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher farm gate — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Sudan (former)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 659,410 kt against 74,891 kt in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
What is the difference in farm gate — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Sudan (former)?
584,519 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Sudan (former)?
22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Sudan (former) rank globally for farm gate — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th and Sudan (former) ranks 12th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Farm gate — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Sudan (former): Farm gate — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/farm-gate-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/sudan-former/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/farm-gate-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/sudan-former/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Sudan (former): Farm gate — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Farm gate — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,129 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf