Rwanda vs Serbia: Farm gate — Indirect emissions
Farm gate — Indirect emissions over time
- Rwanda
- Serbia
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 1.33 kt against 1.3 kt in Serbia, a difference of 0.03 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Rwanda ranks 100th and Serbia ranks 101st of 192 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.35 kt | 1.46 kt | 0.1042 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 1.55 kt | 1.4 kt | 0.1568 kt | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 1.42 kt | 1.36 kt | 0.0631 kt | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher farm gate — indirect emissions, Rwanda or Serbia?
- Rwanda, at 1.33 kt against 1.3 kt in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in farm gate — indirect emissions between Rwanda and Serbia?
- 0.03 kt, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and Serbia rank globally for farm gate — indirect emissions?
- Rwanda ranks 100th and Serbia ranks 101st of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Farm gate — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf