Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Food Packaging — Emissions

Australia and New Zealand
0.379 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1.33 kt
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
15th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
15th

Food Packaging — Emissions over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
00.511.5199020062023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 1.33 kt against 0.379 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.951 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 3.5 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 15th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th of 120 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 0.856 kt 0.09 kt 0.766 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 0.5343 kt 0.2123 kt 0.322 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 0.3874 kt 1.15 kt 0.7632 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 0.3727 kt 1.25 kt 0.8727 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food packaging — emissions, Australia and New Zealand or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 1.33 kt against 0.379 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in food packaging — emissions between Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
0.951 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for food packaging — emissions?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 15th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Food Packaging — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Food Packaging — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
167 places, 5,005 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf