Burkina Faso vs Montenegro: Food Packaging — Emissions
Food Packaging — Emissions over time
- Burkina Faso
- Montenegro
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 0.0002 kt against 0.0002 kt in Montenegro, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 101st and Montenegro ranks 101st of 120 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0004 kt | 0.0002 kt | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0001 kt | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food packaging — emissions, Burkina Faso or Montenegro?
- Burkina Faso, at 0.0002 kt against 0.0002 kt in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food packaging — emissions between Burkina Faso and Montenegro?
- 0 kt, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Montenegro?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Montenegro rank globally for food packaging — emissions?
- Burkina Faso ranks 101st and Montenegro ranks 101st of 120 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf