Eswatini vs Malawi: Food Packaging — Emissions
Food Packaging — Emissions over time
- Eswatini
- Malawi
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.0023 kt against 0.0013 kt in Malawi, a difference of 0.001 kt.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.8 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Malawi ahead.
Eswatini ranks 78th and Malawi ranks 81st of 120 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.001 kt | 0.001 kt | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0.0018 kt | 0.0015 kt | 0.0004 kt | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food packaging — emissions, Eswatini or Malawi?
- Eswatini, at 0.0023 kt against 0.0013 kt in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food packaging — emissions between Eswatini and Malawi?
- 0.001 kt, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Malawi?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Malawi rank globally for food packaging — emissions?
- Eswatini ranks 78th and Malawi ranks 81st of 120 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf