Iraq vs Moldova: Food Packaging — Emissions
Food Packaging — Emissions over time
- Iraq
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 0.0005 kt against 0.0004 kt in Iraq, a difference of 0.0001 kt.
That makes Moldova's figure about 1.2 times Iraq's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.
Iraq ranks 114th and Moldova ranks 112th of 145 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0011 kt | 0.0049 kt | 0.0037 kt | Moldova |
| 2000s | 0.0008 kt | 0.0017 kt | 0.0009 kt | Moldova |
| 2010s | 0.0004 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0002 kt | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food packaging — emissions, Iraq or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 0.0005 kt against 0.0004 kt in Iraq as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food packaging — emissions between Iraq and Moldova?
- 0.0001 kt, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Moldova?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2010.
- How do Iraq and Moldova rank globally for food packaging — emissions?
- Iraq ranks 114th and Moldova ranks 112th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf