Belgium vs Romania: Food Packaging — Emissions
Food Packaging — Emissions over time
- Belgium
- Romania
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 509.34 kt against 486.15 kt in Romania, a difference of 23.19 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Romania ahead.
Belgium ranks 38th and Romania ranks 40th of 120 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 867.82 kt | 1,076 kt | 208.1 kt | Romania |
| 2010s | 634.63 kt | 701.51 kt | 66.88 kt | Romania |
| 2020s | 517.62 kt | 572.41 kt | 54.79 kt | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food packaging — emissions, Belgium or Romania?
- Belgium, at 509.34 kt against 486.15 kt in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food packaging — emissions between Belgium and Romania?
- 23.19 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Romania?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Romania rank globally for food packaging — emissions?
- Belgium ranks 38th and Romania ranks 40th of 120 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf