Burkina Faso vs Syria: Food Packaging — Emissions
Food Packaging — Emissions over time
- Burkina Faso
- Syria
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 2.5 kt against 1.69 kt in Syria, a difference of 0.81 kt.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.5 times Syria's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 130th and Syria ranks 132nd of 145 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.45 kt | 2.21 kt | 0.2413 kt | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 2.48 kt | 1.85 kt | 0.6311 kt | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food packaging — emissions, Burkina Faso or Syria?
- Burkina Faso, at 2.5 kt against 1.69 kt in Syria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food packaging — emissions between Burkina Faso and Syria?
- 0.81 kt, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Syria?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Syria rank globally for food packaging — emissions?
- Burkina Faso ranks 130th and Syria ranks 132nd of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf