OECD vs Russia: Food Packaging — Emissions
Food Packaging — Emissions over time
- OECD
- Russia
How they compare
OECD currently reports 69,267 kt against 12,362 kt in Russia, a difference of 56,905 kt.
That makes OECD's figure about 5.6 times Russia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, OECD has been ahead every year.
OECD ranks 3rd and Russia ranks 5th of 145 countries.
OECD has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | OECD | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 106,328 kt | 7,519 kt | 98,809 kt | OECD |
| 2000s | 100,117 kt | 11,309 kt | 88,808 kt | OECD |
| 2010s | 78,397 kt | 12,867 kt | 65,531 kt | OECD |
| 2020s | 68,853 kt | 12,261 kt | 56,592 kt | OECD |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food packaging — emissions, OECD or Russia?
- OECD, at 69,267 kt against 12,362 kt in Russia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food packaging — emissions between OECD and Russia?
- 56,905 kt, with OECD ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for OECD and Russia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do OECD and Russia rank globally for food packaging — emissions?
- OECD ranks 3rd and Russia ranks 5th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf