Syria vs Uganda: Food Packaging — Emissions
Food Packaging — Emissions over time
- Syria
- Uganda
How they compare
Syria currently reports 1.69 kt against 1.27 kt in Uganda, a difference of 0.42 kt.
That makes Syria's figure about 1.3 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Syria ahead.
Syria ranks 132nd and Uganda ranks 135th of 145 countries.
Syria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Syria | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.43 kt | 3.31 kt | 4.12 kt | Syria |
| 2010s | 3.62 kt | 2.05 kt | 1.57 kt | Syria |
| 2020s | 1.85 kt | 1.08 kt | 0.7654 kt | Syria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food packaging — emissions, Syria or Uganda?
- Syria, at 1.69 kt against 1.27 kt in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food packaging — emissions between Syria and Uganda?
- 0.42 kt, with Syria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Syria and Uganda?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Syria and Uganda rank globally for food packaging — emissions?
- Syria ranks 132nd and Uganda ranks 135th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf