Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Food Packaging — Emissions

Middle Africa
173.52 kt
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
103.35 kt
in 2023
Middle Africa rank
8th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
9th

Food Packaging — Emissions over time

  • Middle Africa
  • United Republic of Tanzania
050100150199020062023

How they compare

Middle Africa currently reports 173.52 kt against 103.35 kt in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 70.17 kt.

That makes Middle Africa's figure about 1.7 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Middle Africa ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 16 groups.

Middle Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 31.06 kt 14.54 kt 16.52 kt Middle Africa
2010s 58.53 kt 16.26 kt 42.28 kt Middle Africa
2020s 163.62 kt 99.16 kt 64.46 kt Middle Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food packaging — emissions, Middle Africa or United Republic of Tanzania?
Middle Africa, at 173.52 kt against 103.35 kt in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in food packaging — emissions between Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
70.17 kt, with Middle Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for food packaging — emissions?
Middle Africa ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 16 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Food Packaging — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-emissions-co2/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-emissions-co2/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Food Packaging — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
168 places, 5,039 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.