Japan vs Vietnam: Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4
Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time
- Japan
- Vietnam
How they compare
Vietnam currently reports 41.56 kt against 40.89 kt in Japan, a difference of 0.67 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 11th and Vietnam ranks 9th of 145 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 57.88 kt | 1.05 kt | 56.83 kt | Japan |
| 2020s | 44.2 kt | 23.96 kt | 20.24 kt | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food packaging — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Japan or Vietnam?
- Vietnam, at 41.56 kt against 40.89 kt in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food packaging — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Japan and Vietnam?
- 0.67 kt, with Vietnam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Vietnam?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Vietnam rank globally for food packaging — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Japan ranks 11th and Vietnam ranks 9th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf