Palestine vs Palestine: Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4
Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time
- Palestine
- Palestine
How they compare
Palestine currently reports 0.0003 kt against 0.0003 kt in Palestine, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Palestine has been ahead every year.
Palestine ranks 138th and Palestine ranks 138th of 145 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Palestine | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food packaging — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Palestine or Palestine?
- Palestine, at 0.0003 kt against 0.0003 kt in Palestine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food packaging — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Palestine and Palestine?
- 0 kt, with Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Palestine and Palestine?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Palestine and Palestine rank globally for food packaging — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Palestine ranks 138th and Palestine ranks 138th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf