Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
0.0347 kt
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
0.0488 kt
in 2023
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
101st
United Republic of Tanzania rank
93rd

Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
00.010.020.030.040.05200620142023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 0.0488 kt against 0.0347 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 0.0141 kt.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.4 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 101st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 93rd of 145 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2010s 0.019 kt 0.0076 kt 0.0113 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2020s 0.0301 kt 0.0468 kt 0.0167 kt United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food packaging — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 0.0488 kt against 0.0347 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in food packaging — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.0141 kt, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for food packaging — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 101st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 93rd of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
178 places, 5,298 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf