Latvia vs Moldova: Food Packaging — Emissions
Food Packaging — Emissions over time
- Latvia
- Moldova
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0001 kt against 0.0001 kt in Moldova, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 97th and Moldova ranks 97th of 145 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0019 kt | 0.0016 kt | Moldova |
| 2000s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0001 kt | Moldova |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food packaging — emissions, Latvia or Moldova?
- Latvia, at 0.0001 kt against 0.0001 kt in Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food packaging — emissions between Latvia and Moldova?
- 0 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Moldova rank globally for food packaging — emissions?
- Latvia ranks 97th and Moldova ranks 97th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf