Malawi vs Peru: Food Packaging — Emissions
Food Packaging — Emissions over time
- Malawi
- Peru
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.0003 kt against 0.0002 kt in Peru, a difference of 0.0001 kt.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.5 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Peru ahead.
Malawi ranks 77th and Peru ranks 80th of 120 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0001 kt | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food packaging — emissions, Malawi or Peru?
- Malawi, at 0.0003 kt against 0.0002 kt in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food packaging — emissions between Malawi and Peru?
- 0.0001 kt, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Peru rank globally for food packaging — emissions?
- Malawi ranks 77th and Peru ranks 80th of 120 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf