Chile vs Latvia: Food Packaging — Energy Use

Chile
2.15 TJ
in 2023
Latvia
0.4496 TJ
in 2023
Chile rank
61st
Latvia rank
63rd

Food Packaging — Energy Use over time

  • Chile
  • Latvia
0100200300400199020062023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 2.15 TJ against 0.4496 TJ in Latvia, a difference of 1.7 TJ.

That makes Chile's figure about 4.8 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 61st and Latvia ranks 63rd of 67 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 27.94 TJ 4.37 TJ 23.57 TJ Chile
2000s 61.34 TJ 3.3 TJ 58.04 TJ Chile
2010s 32.63 TJ 1.24 TJ 31.39 TJ Chile
2020s 1.95 TJ 0.3824 TJ 1.57 TJ Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food packaging — energy use, Chile or Latvia?
Chile, at 2.15 TJ against 0.4496 TJ in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in food packaging — energy use between Chile and Latvia?
1.7 TJ, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Chile and Latvia rank globally for food packaging — energy use?
Chile ranks 61st and Latvia ranks 63rd of 67 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Energy Use (Coal). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Latvia: Food Packaging — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-coal/chile/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-coal/chile/latvia/">Chile vs Latvia: Food Packaging — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Energy Use (Coal)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
99 places, 2,799 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.