Myanmar vs Zimbabwe: Food Packaging — Energy Use

Myanmar
147.31 TJ
in 2023
Zimbabwe
167.41 TJ
in 2023
Myanmar rank
37th
Zimbabwe rank
35th

Food Packaging — Energy Use over time

  • Myanmar
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300400500199020062023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 167.41 TJ against 147.31 TJ in Myanmar, a difference of 20.1 TJ.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Myanmar ranks 37th and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 67 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 88.63 TJ 71.6 TJ 17.02 TJ Myanmar
2020s 106.48 TJ 112.79 TJ 6.3 TJ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food packaging — energy use, Myanmar or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 167.41 TJ against 147.31 TJ in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in food packaging — energy use between Myanmar and Zimbabwe?
20.1 TJ, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Zimbabwe?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Myanmar and Zimbabwe rank globally for food packaging — energy use?
Myanmar ranks 37th and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 67 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Energy Use (Coal). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Zimbabwe: Food Packaging — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-coal/myanmar/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-coal/myanmar/zimbabwe/">Myanmar vs Zimbabwe: Food Packaging — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Energy Use (Coal)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
99 places, 2,799 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.