Brazil vs China: Food Packaging — Energy Use

Brazil
43,246 TJ
in 2023
China
45,078 TJ
in 2023
Brazil rank
5th
China rank
4th

Food Packaging — Energy Use over time

  • Brazil
  • China
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199020062023

How they compare

China currently reports 45,078 TJ against 43,246 TJ in Brazil, a difference of 1,832 TJ.

Across all 34 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 5th and China ranks 4th of 100 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil China Difference Ahead
1990s 2,285 TJ 10,607 TJ 8,322 TJ China
2000s 2,617 TJ 19,079 TJ 16,462 TJ China
2010s 13,359 TJ 36,231 TJ 22,872 TJ China
2020s 40,933 TJ 44,869 TJ 3,936 TJ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food packaging — energy use, Brazil or China?
China, at 45,078 TJ against 43,246 TJ in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in food packaging — energy use between Brazil and China?
1,832 TJ, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and China?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Brazil and China rank globally for food packaging — energy use?
Brazil ranks 5th and China ranks 4th of 100 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Energy Use (Electricity). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs China: Food Packaging — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-electricity/brazil/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-electricity/brazil/china/">Brazil vs China: Food Packaging — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Energy Use (Electricity)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
135 places, 3,946 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.