Belarus vs United States of America: Food Packaging — Energy Use

Belarus
716.84 TJ
in 2023
United States of America
3,053 TJ
in 2023
Belarus rank
12th
United States of America rank
12th

Food Packaging — Energy Use over time

  • Belarus
  • United States of America
02.0k4.0k6.0k199220072023

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 3,053 TJ against 716.84 TJ in Belarus, a difference of 2,336 TJ.

That makes United States of America's figure about 4.3 times Belarus's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 12th and United States of America ranks 12th of 40 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus United States of America Difference Ahead
1990s 440.9 TJ 4,758 TJ 4,317 TJ United States of America
2000s 406.77 TJ 2,796 TJ 2,389 TJ United States of America
2010s 350.74 TJ 3,714 TJ 3,363 TJ United States of America
2020s 713.47 TJ 3,144 TJ 2,430 TJ United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food packaging — energy use, Belarus or United States of America?
United States of America, at 3,053 TJ against 716.84 TJ in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in food packaging — energy use between Belarus and United States of America?
2,336 TJ, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and United States of America?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and United States of America rank globally for food packaging — energy use?
Belarus ranks 12th and United States of America ranks 12th of 40 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Energy Use (Heat). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs United States of America: Food Packaging — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-heat/belarus/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-heat/belarus/united-states-of-america/">Belarus vs United States of America: Food Packaging — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Energy Use (Heat)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
59 places, 1,649 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.