Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Uzbekistan: Food Packaging — Energy Use

Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
274.45 TJ
in 2023
Uzbekistan
202.81 TJ
in 2023
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
17th
Uzbekistan rank
19th

Food Packaging — Energy Use over time

  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
  • Uzbekistan
2505007501.0k1.2k199020062023

How they compare

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) currently reports 274.45 TJ against 202.81 TJ in Uzbekistan, a difference of 71.64 TJ.

That makes Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s figure about 1.4 times Uzbekistan's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) has been ahead every year.

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 17th and Uzbekistan ranks 19th of 40 countries.

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2010s 425.57 TJ 225.08 TJ 200.49 TJ Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2020s 296.25 TJ 204.79 TJ 91.46 TJ Netherlands (Kingdom of the)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food packaging — energy use, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) or Uzbekistan?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the), at 274.45 TJ against 202.81 TJ in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in food packaging — energy use between Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Uzbekistan?
71.64 TJ, with Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Uzbekistan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Uzbekistan rank globally for food packaging — energy use?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 17th and Uzbekistan ranks 19th of 40 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Energy Use (Heat). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Uzbekistan: Food Packaging — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-heat/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-heat/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/uzbekistan/">Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Uzbekistan: Food Packaging — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Energy Use (Heat)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
59 places, 1,649 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.