Australia and New Zealand vs Viet Nam: Food Packaging — Energy Use

Australia and New Zealand
21,907 TJ
in 2023
Viet Nam
2,247 TJ
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
7th
Viet Nam rank
6th

Food Packaging — Energy Use over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Viet Nam
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199020062023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 21,907 TJ against 2,247 TJ in Viet Nam, a difference of 19,660 TJ.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 9.8 times Viet Nam's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Viet Nam ranks 6th of 81 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Viet Nam Difference Ahead
2010s 26,561 TJ 574.69 TJ 25,986 TJ Australia and New Zealand
2020s 22,095 TJ 1,944 TJ 20,151 TJ Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food packaging — energy use, Australia and New Zealand or Viet Nam?
Australia and New Zealand, at 21,907 TJ against 2,247 TJ in Viet Nam as of 2023.
What is the difference in food packaging — energy use between Australia and New Zealand and Viet Nam?
19,660 TJ, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Viet Nam?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Viet Nam rank globally for food packaging — energy use?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Viet Nam ranks 6th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Viet Nam: Food Packaging — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/australia-and-new-zealand/viet-nam-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/australia-and-new-zealand/viet-nam-2/">Australia and New Zealand vs Viet Nam: Food Packaging — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
122 places, 3,461 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.