Australia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Food Packaging — Energy Use

Australia
21,121 TJ
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
1,842 TJ
in 2023
Australia rank
9th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

Food Packaging — Energy Use over time

  • Australia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199020062023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 21,121 TJ against 1,842 TJ in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 19,279 TJ.

That makes Australia's figure about 11.5 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 81 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 38,072 TJ 259.2 TJ 37,813 TJ Australia
2010s 25,605 TJ 289.78 TJ 25,315 TJ Australia
2020s 21,257 TJ 1,768 TJ 19,489 TJ Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food packaging — energy use, Australia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Australia, at 21,121 TJ against 1,842 TJ in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in food packaging — energy use between Australia and United Republic of Tanzania?
19,279 TJ, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and United Republic of Tanzania?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Australia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for food packaging — energy use?
Australia ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Food Packaging — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/australia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/australia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Australia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Food Packaging — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
122 places, 3,461 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.