Bahrain vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Food Packaging — Energy Use

Bahrain
219.91 TJ
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina
234.75 TJ
in 2023
Bahrain rank
72nd
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
69th

Food Packaging — Energy Use over time

  • Bahrain
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
0100200300199020062023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 234.75 TJ against 219.91 TJ in Bahrain, a difference of 14.84 TJ.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Bahrain's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Bahrain ahead.

Bahrain ranks 72nd and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 69th of 81 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bahrain averaged higher in 2 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahrain Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
2000s 121.83 TJ 49.67 TJ 72.16 TJ Bahrain
2010s 143.94 TJ 172.17 TJ 28.22 TJ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 216.68 TJ 214.56 TJ 2.12 TJ Bahrain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food packaging — energy use, Bahrain or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 234.75 TJ against 219.91 TJ in Bahrain as of 2023.
What is the difference in food packaging — energy use between Bahrain and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
14.84 TJ, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Bahrain and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for food packaging — energy use?
Bahrain ranks 72nd and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 69th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahrain vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Food Packaging — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/bahrain/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/bahrain/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Bahrain vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Food Packaging — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
122 places, 3,461 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.