United Republic of Tanzania vs Viet Nam: Food Packaging — Energy Use

United Republic of Tanzania
1,842 TJ
in 2023
Viet Nam
2,247 TJ
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th
Viet Nam rank
6th

Food Packaging — Energy Use over time

  • United Republic of Tanzania
  • Viet Nam
05001.0k1.5k2.0k200620142023

How they compare

Viet Nam currently reports 2,247 TJ against 1,842 TJ in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 405 TJ.

That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.2 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th and Viet Nam ranks 6th of 10 countries.

Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Republic of Tanzania Viet Nam Difference Ahead
2010s 289.78 TJ 574.69 TJ 284.91 TJ Viet Nam
2020s 1,768 TJ 1,944 TJ 176.57 TJ Viet Nam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food packaging — energy use, United Republic of Tanzania or Viet Nam?
Viet Nam, at 2,247 TJ against 1,842 TJ in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in food packaging — energy use between United Republic of Tanzania and Viet Nam?
405 TJ, with Viet Nam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Republic of Tanzania and Viet Nam?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do United Republic of Tanzania and Viet Nam rank globally for food packaging — energy use?
United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th and Viet Nam ranks 6th of 10 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Republic of Tanzania vs Viet Nam: Food Packaging — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/united-republic-of-tanzania/viet-nam-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/united-republic-of-tanzania/viet-nam-2/">United Republic of Tanzania vs Viet Nam: Food Packaging — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
122 places, 3,461 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.