China, Taiwan Province of vs Poland: Food Packaging — Energy Use

China, Taiwan Province of
29,810 TJ
in 2023
Poland
23,488 TJ
in 2023
China, Taiwan Province of rank
16th
Poland rank
19th

Food Packaging — Energy Use over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • Poland
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199020062023

How they compare

China, Taiwan Province of currently reports 29,810 TJ against 23,488 TJ in Poland, a difference of 6,322 TJ.

That makes China, Taiwan Province of's figure about 1.3 times Poland's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, China, Taiwan Province of has been ahead every year.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 16th and Poland ranks 19th of 110 countries.

China, Taiwan Province of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 35,506 TJ 20,405 TJ 15,101 TJ China, Taiwan Province of
2000s 35,418 TJ 18,729 TJ 16,689 TJ China, Taiwan Province of
2010s 35,623 TJ 22,933 TJ 12,690 TJ China, Taiwan Province of
2020s 30,602 TJ 24,313 TJ 6,288 TJ China, Taiwan Province of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food packaging — energy use, China, Taiwan Province of or Poland?
China, Taiwan Province of, at 29,810 TJ against 23,488 TJ in Poland as of 2023.
What is the difference in food packaging — energy use between China, Taiwan Province of and Poland?
6,322 TJ, with China, Taiwan Province of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and Poland?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and Poland rank globally for food packaging — energy use?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 16th and Poland ranks 19th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Energy Use (Total). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs Poland: Food Packaging — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-total/china-taiwan-province-of/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-total/china-taiwan-province-of/poland/">China, Taiwan Province of vs Poland: Food Packaging — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Energy Use (Total)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
155 places, 4,536 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.