Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Middle Africa: Food Packaging — Energy Use

Democratic Republic of the Congo
94.43 TJ
in 2023
Middle Africa
937.08 TJ
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
12th
Middle Africa rank
9th

Food Packaging — Energy Use over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Middle Africa
02004006008001.0k199620092023

How they compare

Middle Africa currently reports 937.08 TJ against 94.43 TJ in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 842.65 TJ.

That makes Middle Africa's figure about 9.9 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Middle Africa has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 12th and Middle Africa ranks 9th of 13 countries.

Middle Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Middle Africa Difference Ahead
2010s 45.83 TJ 736.41 TJ 690.58 TJ Middle Africa
2020s 79.66 TJ 884.01 TJ 804.35 TJ Middle Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food packaging — energy use, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Middle Africa?
Middle Africa, at 937.08 TJ against 94.43 TJ in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in food packaging — energy use between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Middle Africa?
842.65 TJ, with Middle Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Middle Africa?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Middle Africa rank globally for food packaging — energy use?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 12th and Middle Africa ranks 9th of 13 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Energy Use (Total). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Middle Africa: Food Packaging — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-total/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/middle-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-total/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/middle-africa/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Middle Africa: Food Packaging — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Energy Use (Total)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
155 places, 4,536 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.