Botswana vs Malta: Food Processing — Emissions
Food Processing — Emissions over time
- Botswana
- Malta
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.0012 kt against 0.0009 kt in Malta, a difference of 0.0003 kt.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.3 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Malta ahead.
Botswana ranks 101st and Malta ranks 104th of 112 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0011 kt | 0.0014 kt | 0.0003 kt | Malta |
| 2020s | 0.0012 kt | 0.0009 kt | 0.0003 kt | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions, Botswana or Malta?
- Botswana, at 0.0012 kt against 0.0009 kt in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Botswana and Malta?
- 0.0003 kt, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Malta?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Malta rank globally for food processing — emissions?
- Botswana ranks 101st and Malta ranks 104th of 112 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf