Czechia vs Malawi: Food Processing — Emissions
Food Processing — Emissions over time
- Czechia
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.1263 kt against 0.1226 kt in Czechia, a difference of 0.0037 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 35th and Malawi ranks 34th of 98 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1469 kt | 0.0739 kt | 0.073 kt | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.1427 kt | 0.0952 kt | 0.0475 kt | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.128 kt | 0.1287 kt | 0.0006 kt | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions, Czechia or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 0.1263 kt against 0.1226 kt in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Czechia and Malawi?
- 0.0037 kt, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Malawi?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Malawi rank globally for food processing — emissions?
- Czechia ranks 35th and Malawi ranks 34th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf