Greenland vs Malta: Food Processing — Emissions
Food Processing — Emissions over time
- Greenland
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.0009 kt against 0.0008 kt in Greenland, a difference of 0.0001 kt.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Greenland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Malta ahead.
Greenland ranks 91st and Malta ranks 90th of 98 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0007 kt | 0.0014 kt | 0.0007 kt | Malta |
| 2020s | 0.0008 kt | 0.0009 kt | 0.0001 kt | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions, Greenland or Malta?
- Malta, at 0.0009 kt against 0.0008 kt in Greenland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Greenland and Malta?
- 0.0001 kt, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Malta?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Greenland and Malta rank globally for food processing — emissions?
- Greenland ranks 91st and Malta ranks 90th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf