Chile vs Costa Rica: Food Processing — Emissions
Food Processing — Emissions over time
- Chile
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Chile currently reports 394.09 kt against 371.8 kt in Costa Rica, a difference of 22.29 kt.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Chile ranks 55th and Costa Rica ranks 57th of 98 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 353.01 kt | 409.75 kt | 56.74 kt | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 412.54 kt | 380.12 kt | 32.42 kt | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions, Chile or Costa Rica?
- Chile, at 394.09 kt against 371.8 kt in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Chile and Costa Rica?
- 22.29 kt, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Costa Rica?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Costa Rica rank globally for food processing — emissions?
- Chile ranks 55th and Costa Rica ranks 57th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf