Malawi vs Tunisia: Food Processing — Emissions
Food Processing — Emissions over time
- Malawi
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 627.52 kt against 518.12 kt in Malawi, a difference of 109.4 kt.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 50th and Tunisia ranks 48th of 98 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 276.02 kt | 393.93 kt | 117.91 kt | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 382.02 kt | 519.81 kt | 137.79 kt | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 530.64 kt | 620.48 kt | 89.84 kt | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions, Malawi or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 627.52 kt against 518.12 kt in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Malawi and Tunisia?
- 109.4 kt, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tunisia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Tunisia rank globally for food processing — emissions?
- Malawi ranks 50th and Tunisia ranks 48th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf