Romania vs Uzbekistan: Food Processing — Emissions
Food Processing — Emissions over time
- Romania
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Romania currently reports 1,914 kt against 1,801 kt in Uzbekistan, a difference of 113 kt.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Romania ranks 40th and Uzbekistan ranks 43rd of 112 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,769 kt | 252.67 kt | 1,516 kt | Romania |
| 2020s | 1,839 kt | 1,533 kt | 306.27 kt | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions, Romania or Uzbekistan?
- Romania, at 1,914 kt against 1,801 kt in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Romania and Uzbekistan?
- 113 kt, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Uzbekistan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Romania and Uzbekistan rank globally for food processing — emissions?
- Romania ranks 40th and Uzbekistan ranks 43rd of 112 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf