Australia and New Zealand vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq)

Australia and New Zealand
16,641 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo
0.0984 kt
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
9th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
10th

Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199020062023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 16,641 kt against 0.0984 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 16,641 kt.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 10th of 107 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 12,260 kt 0 kt 12,260 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 13,440 kt 0 kt 13,440 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 15,979 kt 0.0233 kt 15,979 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 16,848 kt 0.083 kt 16,848 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food processing — emissions (co2eq), Australia and New Zealand or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Australia and New Zealand, at 16,641 kt against 0.0984 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in food processing — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and New Zealand and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
16,641 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for food processing — emissions (co2eq)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 10th of 107 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Australia and New Zealand vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
148 places, 4,834 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf