Morocco vs Serbia: Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq)
Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Morocco
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 2,106 kt against 2,044 kt in Morocco, a difference of 62 kt.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Morocco ranks 40th and Serbia ranks 38th of 122 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt | 1,197 kt | 1,197 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 1,190 kt | 2,366 kt | 1,176 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 2,016 kt | 2,094 kt | 77.88 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions (co2eq), Morocco or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 2,106 kt against 2,044 kt in Morocco as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions (co2eq) between Morocco and Serbia?
- 62 kt, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Morocco and Serbia rank globally for food processing — emissions (co2eq)?
- Morocco ranks 40th and Serbia ranks 38th of 122 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf