Australia vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Australia
77.61 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo
0.0358 kt
in 2023
Australia rank
7th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
9th

Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Australia
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
020406080100199020062023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 77.61 kt against 0.0358 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 77.57 kt.

That makes Australia's figure about 2,168.0 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 7th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 9th of 98 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
2010s 78.77 kt 0.0185 kt 78.76 kt Australia
2020s 78.54 kt 0.0302 kt 78.51 kt Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food processing — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Australia or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Australia, at 77.61 kt against 0.0358 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in food processing — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Australia and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
77.57 kt, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Australia and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for food processing — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Australia ranks 7th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 9th of 98 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Australia vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
138 places, 3,653 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf